Mark Carver spent eleven years in prison after being convicted of Ira Yarmolenko's murder based primarily on touch DNA evidence that was later proven unreliable and possibly contaminated. His case exposes the dangers of touch DNA in criminal proceedings, where innocent people can be convicted through primary, secondary, or tertiary DNA transfer that places their genetic material at crime scenes they never visited.
If Carver and Cassada didn't kill Ira, then who did?
Join the All That is Hidden Facebook Sleuth Group for photos, videos, content and additional discussion: https://www.facebook.com/share/g/1BPE7TdxVy/
Sources used to collect this information include various public news sites, interviews, court documents, Social Media groups dedicated to the case, and non-profit innocence organization sites. Although, data is primarily from news sources, when quoting statements made by others, they are strictly alleged until confirmed otherwise. Please remember these podcasts are an independent opinion and to always do your own research.••••••••••••••••••Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are personal and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any other agency, organization, employer, or company. Assumptions made in the analysis are not reflective of the position of any entity other than the creator(s). These views are subject to change, revision, and rethinking at any time and are not to be held in perpetuity. We make no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, correctness, suitability, or validity of any information on this podcast and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. All information is provided on an as-is basis. It is the reader’s responsibility to verify their own facts.