Podcast cover

What's Our Verdict Reviews

What's Our Verdict
374 episodes   Last Updated: Jun 02, 25
Out of the ashes of the internet a podcast was formed. Four friends from different backgrounds united to create a pod for the common man. Devoid of the tedium of critically acclaimed podcasts, these brave souls embarked on a holy mission, to bring the light-hearted attitude of discussing movies with friends to the podcasting scene. However, due to unforeseen budget cuts two of their number were lost to the void of the internet. Doomed for eternity to find nothing but cat videos and food challenges. The remaining heroes, JJ and Mattson searched far and wide for a suitable replacement but in the end settled for Alec. These two and a half heroes continue in their mission to bring an enjoyable conversation about movies and tv shows directly to you, our viewers. Join us wherever fine podcasts can be found and chime into the conversation to join our crew of misfits. Come follow us on social media on Instagram, Facebook and Twitter all @whatsourverdict. You can also email us at hosts@whatsourverdict.com or visit us at our website www.whatsourverdict.com.

Episodes

Alec and JJ dive into the multifaceted nature of the film "Dazed and Confused," a quintessential representation of the 1970s high school experience. We examine the film's narrative, which encapsulates the essence of adolescence while simultaneously highlighting the complexities of social dynamics among youth. The discussion addresses the themes of camaraderie and the intricate balance of bullying, which, as we contend, can sometimes serve as a rite of passage rather than mere cruelty. The hosts share their personal reflections on how the film resonates with their own formative years, contrasting experiences and noting the evolution of societal perceptions surrounding youth interactions. Ultimately, we celebrate the film's quotability, memorable characters, and its enduring status as a beloved classic that continues to evoke laughter and nostalgia.Support us:https://www.patreon.com/whatsourverdictEmail us: hosts@whatsourverdict.comFollow us:Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/whatsourverdictTwitter: @whatsourverdictInstagram: @whatsourverdictYouTube: https://youtube.com/channel/UC-K_E-ofs3b85BnoU4R6liAVisit us:www.whatsourverdict.com
Mattson, Alec, and JJ have a discission that revolves around the cinematic exploration of "Hacksaw Ridge," a film directed by Mel Gibson that recounts the extraordinary true story of Desmond Doss, the first conscientious objector to receive the Medal of Honor. We delve into the complexities of Doss's character, who, despite refusing to carry a weapon, demonstrated unparalleled bravery by saving numerous soldiers during the Battle of Okinawa. The discussion highlights the dichotomy between the film's compelling portrayals of heroism and the criticisms of Gibson's directorial choices, particularly regarding historical accuracy. We reflect on the emotional weight of the film's climactic battle scenes, which serve as a testament to Doss's conviction and courage, juxtaposed against the slower narrative build-up that precedes them. Ultimately, this episode serves as a profound examination of the moral dilemmas faced by individuals in wartime, as well as the impact of storytelling in shaping our understanding of historical events.Support us:https://www.patreon.com/whatsourverdictEmail us: hosts@whatsourverdict.comFollow us:Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/whatsourverdictTwitter: @whatsourverdictInstagram: @whatsourverdictYouTube: https://youtube.com/channel/UC-K_E-ofs3b85BnoU4R6liAVisit us:www.whatsourverdict.com
JJ, Mattson, and Alec dive into a comprehensive exposition on the film "The Deer Hunter," a cinematic exploration that delves into the profound and harrowing effects of the Vietnam War on a group of friends from a small Pennsylvania steel town. The conversation commences with a juxtaposition of youthful appearances of renowned actors such as Robert De Niro, Christopher Walken, and Meryl Streep, highlighting the striking contrasts to their later careers. We engage in a critical analysis of the film's narrative structure, which some find convoluted, particularly in its pacing and transitions, as it oscillates between scenes of domestic life and the stark realities of war. Central to the discourse is the film's unflinching portrayal of the psychological trauma inflicted upon soldiers, emphasizing that it eschews romanticized depictions of warfare in favor of a more somber and realistic narrative. Ultimately, we conclude with personal reflections on the film's emotional weight, acknowledging its artistic merits while also expressing reservations regarding its length and editing choices, thus inviting listeners to contemplate the complexities inherent in war cinema.Support us:https://www.patreon.com/whatsourverdictEmail us: hosts@whatsourverdict.comFollow us:Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/whatsourverdictTwitter: @whatsourverdictInstagram: @whatsourverdictYouTube: https://youtube.com/channel/UC-K_E-ofs3b85BnoU4R6liAVisit us:www.whatsourverdict.com
Alec, JJ and Mattson's discussion centers upon Stanley Kubrick's seminal 1987 film, "Full Metal Jacket," wherein we conduct an exhaustive analysis of its dual narrative structure, comprising the harrowing boot camp experience juxtaposed against the chaos of the Vietnam War. We dissect the profound impact of R. Lee Ermey’s portrayal of the drill sergeant, which many believe singularly elevates the film's initial act to an unparalleled level of cinematic excellence, yet we lament the subsequent decline in narrative cohesion and engagement in the latter half. The variance in pacing and thematic exploration between the two segments prompts us to contemplate Kubrick's artistic choices and the efficacy of his directorial vision. Throughout our discourse, we reflect upon the film's commentary on the dehumanization of soldiers and the moral complexities intertwined with the experience of war. Ultimately, we arrive at a consensus that while the film remains undeniably significant, its bifurcated nature invites a myriad of critiques regarding its overall effectiveness and lasting legacy.Support us:https://www.patreon.com/whatsourverdictEmail us: hosts@whatsourverdict.comFollow us:Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/whatsourverdictTwitter: @whatsourverdictInstagram: @whatsourverdictYouTube: https://youtube.com/channel/UC-K_E-ofs3b85BnoU4R6liAVisit us:www.whatsourverdict.com
May 05, 2025
Gettysburg (1993)
Mattson, Alec and JJ delve into the cinematic representation of the Battle of Gettysburg, as depicted in the film "Gettysburg," directed by Ron Maxwell. The discussion commences with an acknowledgment of the film's length, a staggering four and a half hours, yet the hosts express their admiration for its historical depth and character development. We explore the compelling narrative derived from Michael Shaara's "Killer Angels," which provides a nuanced portrayal of the events and figures surrounding this pivotal moment in American history. Through their analysis, we examine the emotional resonance of the characters, particularly highlighting the dialogues that echo the sentiments of the actual historical figures. Ultimately, this episode serves as a comprehensive exploration of the film's artistic merit and its significant contribution to the understanding of the Civil War narrative.Support us:https://www.patreon.com/whatsourverdictEmail us: hosts@whatsourverdict.comFollow us:Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/whatsourverdictTwitter: @whatsourverdictInstagram: @whatsourverdictYouTube: https://youtube.com/channel/UC-K_E-ofs3b85BnoU4R6liAVisit us:www.whatsourverdict.com
JJ, Mattson and Alec dive into a cinematic exploration of "Forgetting Sarah Marshall," a film characterized by its unique blend of humor and heartfelt moments. We delve into the narrative's examination of heartbreak and self-discovery, as the protagonist, Peter, embarks on a journey to heal from his emotional turmoil. Through a rigorous analysis, we highlight the film's adept portrayal of relatable characters and situations, which contributes significantly to its comedic essence. Our discussion further encompasses the performances of the ensemble cast, particularly the transformative comedic style exhibited by Jason Segel and the intriguing dynamics brought forth by Russell Brand's character. Ultimately, we reflect on the film's capacity to evoke laughter while simultaneously imparting poignant life lessons, rendering it a noteworthy entry in the realm of romantic comedies.Support us:https://www.patreon.com/whatsourverdictEmail us: hosts@whatsourverdict.comFollow us:Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/whatsourverdictTwitter: @whatsourverdictInstagram: @whatsourverdictYouTube: https://youtube.com/channel/UC-K_E-ofs3b85BnoU4R6liAVisit us:www.whatsourverdict.com
Apr 21, 2025
Bridesmaids (2011)
The central theme of JJ, Alec and Mattson's discourse revolves around the cinematic work "Bridesmaids," a film that has elicited a spectrum of opinions from us regarding its merits and shortcomings. Throughout this episode, we engage in a meticulous examination of the film, which, while possessing certain comedic elements, is ultimately perceived as excessively prolonged and replete with moments that fail to achieve the desired comedic impact. The dialogue traverses the performances of the cast, notably Kristen Wiig and Melissa McCarthy, as we delve into the nuances of their portrayals and the overall chemistry that either enhances or detracts from the narrative. Furthermore, we express our collective sentiments regarding the film's structure, asserting that its attempts at humor frequently exceed acceptable bounds, leading to a dilution of its potential wit. As we conclude our analysis, we offer our ratings, reflecting a consensus that, despite some redeeming qualities, "Bridesmaids" ultimately falls short of the standards expected from a contemporary comedy.Support us:https://www.patreon.com/whatsourverdictEmail us: hosts@whatsourverdict.comFollow us:Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/whatsourverdictTwitter: @whatsourverdictInstagram: @whatsourverdictYouTube: https://youtube.com/channel/UC-K_E-ofs3b85BnoU4R6liAVisit us:www.whatsourverdict.com
Alec, JJ and Mattson lean into an analysis of the film "Failure to Launch." Our primary contention revolves around the excessive emotional manipulation experienced by the protagonist, Tripp, a character portrayed by Matthew McConaughey, whose predicament elicits both humor and dismay. While we acknowledge the film's predictable narrative structure, we also appreciate its comedic elements and the ensemble cast's performances, particularly those of Sarah Jessica Parker and Bradley Cooper. Throughout our dialogue, we examine the dynamics of the characters and their interactions, noting the film's blend of absurdity and charm. Ultimately, we express a collective sentiment that despite its flaws, the movie provides an entertaining experience worthy of discourse within the romantic comedy genre.Support us:https://www.patreon.com/whatsourverdictEmail us: hosts@whatsourverdict.comFollow us:Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/whatsourverdictTwitter: @whatsourverdictInstagram: @whatsourverdictYouTube: https://youtube.com/channel/UC-K_E-ofs3b85BnoU4R6liAVisit us:www.whatsourverdict.com
Mattson, Alec and JJ jump into the cinematic exploration of "The Proposal," a romantic comedy released in 2009, featuring prominent actors such as Sandra Bullock and Ryan Reynolds. The discourse elucidates the film's narrative, which revolves around a New York editor facing deportation who persuades her assistant to enter into a marriage of convenience. The hosts engage in a critical evaluation of the film's strengths and weaknesses, emphasizing the performances of supporting characters, particularly Betty White and Oscar Nunez, who are noted for their comedic prowess. As the conversation unfolds, we grapple with the film's pacing and character development, ultimately expressing a mix of enjoyment and dissatisfaction. The episode serves not only as a critique of "The Proposal" but also as a broader commentary on the romantic comedy genre as a whole.Support us:https://www.patreon.com/whatsourverdictEmail us: hosts@whatsourverdict.comFollow us:Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/whatsourverdictTwitter: @whatsourverdictInstagram: @whatsourverdictYouTube: https://youtube.com/channel/UC-K_E-ofs3b85BnoU4R6liAVisit us:www.whatsourverdict.com
JJ, Mattson and Alec dive into the cinematic portrayal of sports and community through the lens of the film "McFarland, USA." We commence our discussion by acknowledging the intricate narrative that unfolds as Coach Jim White transforms a group of underperforming students into a formidable cross-country team, exemplifying the profound impact of mentorship and teamwork. The dialogue traverses the authenticity of the film's depiction of the athletes' struggles and triumphs, while also addressing the broader societal implications of their journey. They share personal anecdotes that resonate with the film's themes, drawing parallels between our own experiences in athletics and the challenges faced by the characters on screen. Ultimately, they reflect on the film's ability to evoke a sense of hope and community, underscoring the transformative power of sports in shaping lives and fostering connections.Support us:https://www.patreon.com/whatsourverdictEmail us: hosts@whatsourverdict.comFollow us:Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/whatsourverdictTwitter: @whatsourverdictInstagram: @whatsourverdictYouTube: https://youtube.com/channel/UC-K_E-ofs3b85BnoU4R6liAVisit us:www.whatsourverdict.com