We’re back to our regular programming with a fun debate between a future psychiatrist and a psychologist, as Michael Watson joins Steph to talk Stutz, the Netflix documentary “about” Dr Phil Stutz created by Jonah Hill. Steph & Michael discuss how the unique revolutionary techniques Stutz employs aren’t quite so unique or revolutionary, and what Jonah was trying and succeeding to portray from this film. BUTTT OF COURSE within the context of the wild and gross texts that Jonah’s ex Sarah Brady shared from the actor in July this year. What do the texts say about how effective the therapy portrayed in Stutz actually is? And what actually IS a boundary?
Special thanks to Laura Packer for sound editing <3
CONTENT WARNING: Discussion of emotional abuse, coercive control, body shaming, death of a sibling (very brief)
Follow Psychocinematic on Instagram, Twitter and Tiktok! or join our Facebook Group! Email us at psychocinematicpodcast@gmail.com. Join our PATREON to support us and get cute benefits and bonus content! And check out our NEW WEBSITE!
REFERENCES:
SKEPTIC’s REVIEW: “Stutz” (2022) | NETFLIX Documentary | Movie Analysis - PSYCHOLOGY CORNER Film Review: The Therapeutic Relationship in "Stutz" | Psychology Today Australia Review: Stutz | View from the shrink's couch (reelgood.com.au) Stutz Review: Jonah Hill’s Cagey Netflix Doc About His Psychiatrist – IndieWire Let’s Call Jonah Hill’s Alleged Text Messages What They Are: Misogynistic | Vogue Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (apa.org) Netflix psychiatrist Phil Stutz says 85% of early therapy gains are down to lifestyle changes. Is he right? (theconversation.com)NOTE: This podcast is not designed to be therapeutic, prescriptive or constitute a formal diagnosis for any listener, nor the characters discussed. The host is not representative of all psychologists and opinions stated are her own personal opinion, based on her own learnings and training (and minimal lived experience). Host and co-hosts do not have the final say and can only comment based on their own perspectives, so please let us know if you dispute any of these opinions – we are keen for feedback!